Foreign Experience of Consolidation of Municipalities: Significance for Russia

ERI FEB RAS	Issue's contents	RUS
	Regionalistica 2023 Volume 10 number 3 pages 40-50

Title of the article	Foreign Experience of Consolidation of Municipalities: Significance for Russia
Pages	40-50
Author 1	Leonov Sergey Nikolaevich doctor of economics, professor, leading researcher Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153, Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0001-6936-5436
Author 2	Tarasenko Mikhail Ruslanovich post-graduate student Far-Eastern Institute of Management – Branch of RANEPA 33, Muravyev-Amurskiy Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680000 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID:
Abstract	In the article, using general scientific research methods, the analysis of approaches to improving the territorial structure of local self-government in foreign countries in terms of the enlargement of municipalities is carried out. The theoretical positions developed by modern science, as well as the experience of the modern stage of consolidation of municipalities in European countries, Australia and Canada, proposed by the practice of municipal construction, are analyzed. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the arguments of supporters and opponents of the consolidation of municipalities, economic and institutional aspects of this process. Based on the performed analysis, the conclusion is made about the insolvency of the classical economic argument in favor of the consolidation of municipalities (achieving economies of scale), since it gives the expected economic effect only when a limited number of the smallest municipalities merge. The expected savings on administrative expenses, even if they are observed, are covered by an increase in the costs of fulfilling the main powers of the municipality (for education and health care). In fact, in foreign countries there are no generally accepted quantitative criteria for justifying the rationality of merging (consolidation) of municipalities. It is recognized that consolidation is not a universal option for the development of all subsidized municipalities, each specific case requires analysis and consideration of the socio-economic features of the consolidation of municipalities. Therefore, the main approach that the authorities adhere to when justifying measures to organize a rational territorial structure of municipalities abroad is a situational approach. It is shown that trying to transfer the positive aspects of the foreign experience of the consolidation of municipalities into the Russian reality, one should not forget about an alternative instrument to support the financing of the institute of local self-government – the development of inter-municipal cooperation, recognized in the modern world as an important potential source of co-financing of municipal development.
Code	338.43(571.6)
DOI	10.14530/reg.2023.3.40
Keywords	local self-government, municipalities, territorial reform
Download	2023-03.40.pdf
For citation	Leonov S.N., Tarasenko M.R. Foreign Experience of Consolidation of Municipalities: Significance for Russia. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2023. Vol. 10. No. 3. Pp. 40–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2023.3.40 (In Russian)
References	1. Babun R.V. The System of Municipal Formations of Russia: Problems and Ways of Their Solution. Mestnoe pravo [Local Law]. 2015. No. 5. Pp. 3–13. (In Russian) 2. Barabash E.S. Foreign Experience of Intermunicipal Cooperation. Izvestiya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii [Izvestiya of Irkutsk State Economics Academy]. 2012. No. 3 (83). Pp. 69–73. (In Russian) 3. Gotsko T.V. Development of Inter-Municipal Cooperation As a Priority for Sustainable Economic Growth of Territories. Ekonomika, predprinimatel’stvo i parvo = Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 5. Pp. 1353–1370. http://dx.doi.org/10.18334/epp.13.5.117566 (In Russian) 4. Koski A. Consolidation of Municipalities: The Experience of Finland. Praktika munitsipal’nogo upravleniya [Municipal Management Practices]. 2012. No. 8. (In Russian) 5. Kuznetsov S.V., Mezhevich N.M., Shamakhov V.A. Spatial Aspect of the Evolution of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation: Possibilities of Taking into Account Foreign Experience. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie [Administrative Consulting]. 2019. No. 9 (129). Pp. 8–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-9-8-18 (In Russian) 6. Leksin I.V. Peculiarities of Local Administration Territorial Organization in Canada. Problemnyy analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie [Problem Analysis and Public Administration Projection]. 2011. Vol. 4. Issue 2. Pp. 99–108. (In Russian) 7. Leonov S.N. Spatial Organization of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Russia. Izvestiya Baikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Baikal State University. 2022. Vol. 32. No. 3. Pp. 501–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2500-2759.2022.32(3).501-511 (In Russian) 8. Leonov S.N. Financial and Structural Aspects of the Local Self-Government Reform in Russia. Ed. by N.N. Mikheeva. Khabarovsk, 2023. 232 p. (In Russian) 9. Leonov S.N., Barabash E.S. Financial and Structural Prospects of Local Government Reform in Russia. Izvestiya Baikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Baikal State University. 2023. Vol. 33. No. 1. Pp. 46–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2500-2759.2023.33(1).46-56 (In Russian) 10. Markvart E., Franzke J. Modern Territorial Reforms of Local Self-Government in Germany and Russia. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2017. No. 3. Pp. 40–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2017.3.040-061 (In Russian) 11. Pakshenkova S.V. The Experience of Municipal Formations Enlargement in Russian and Foreign Practice. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Izvestiya of Altai State University]. 2010. No. 2-1 (66). Pp. 272–276. (In Russian) 12. Puzanov A.S., Popov R.A. Assessment of Territorial Accessibility of Local Self-Government: Economic and Geographical research. Munitsipal’noe imushchestvo: ekonomika, pravo, upravlenie [Municipal Property: Economics, Law, Management]. 2017. No. 3. Pp. 24–30. (In Russian) 13. Shvetsov A. Economic Rationalization of the Choice of Municipal Entities’ Spatial Parameters. Federalizm [Federalism]. 2007. No. 3 (47). Pp. 75–95. (In Russian) 14. Shvetsov A.N. Structural Reforms of Municipal Space: Usefulness Justification and Efficiency Evaluation. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya [Region: Economics and Sociology]. 2018. No. 4 (100). Pp. 228–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.15372/REG20180409 (In Russian) 15. Bish R.L. Local Government Amalgamations. Discredited Nineteenth-Century Ideals Alive in the Twenty-First. In: C.D. Howe Institute Commentary. 2001. No. 150. Available at: https://www.uvic.ca/hsd/publicadmin/assets/docs/BBish/amalgamation_cd_howe.pdf (accessed May 2023). 16. Boyne G.A. Local Government Structure and Performance: Lessons from America? Public Administration. 1992. Vol. 70. No. 3. Pp. 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1992.tb00942.x 17. Denters S.A.H. Size and Political Trust: Evidence from Denmark, The Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2002. Vol. 20. No. 6. Pp. 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0225 18. Dollery B., Byrnes J., Crase L. Is Bigger Better? Local Government Amalgamation and the South Australian Rising to the Challenge Inquiry. Economic Analysis and Policy. 2007. Vol. 37. No. 1. Pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(07)50001-9 19. Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A.J. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1999. 367 p. 20. Grosskopf Sh., Yaisawarng S. Economies of Scope in Provision of Local Public Services. National Tax Journal. 1990. Vol. 43. No. 1. Pp. 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788825 21. Ivanyna M., Shah A. How Close is Your Government to Its People? Worldwide Indicators on Localization and Decentralization. Economics. 2014. Vol. 8. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-3 22. Larsen Ch.A. Municipal Size and Democracy: A Critical Analysis of the Argument of Proximity Based on the Case of Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2002. Vol. 25. No. 4. Pp. 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00074 23. Nakazawa K. Does the Method of Amalgamation Affect Cost Inefficiency of the New Municipalities? Open Journal of Applied Sciences. 2014. Vol. 4. No. 4. Pp. 143–154. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2014.44015 24. Pevcin P. Municipal Mergers: Theoretical Considerations, Practical Evidence and Potential Implications. In: 8th International Scientific Conference «Future World by 2050», 1–3 June 2017, Pula, Croatia. Conference Proceedings. Available at: https://www.unipu.hr/futureworld2050/conference_proceedings# (accessed May 2023). 25. Pevcin P. The Evidence on the Existence of Economies of Scale in Local Government Units. In: KnE Social Sciences. 2017. Vol. 1. No. 2. Pp. 379–384. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v1i2.673 26. Rahn W.M., Rudolph T.J. A Tale of Political Trust in American Cities. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2005. Vol. 69. No. 4. Pp. 530–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi056 27. Shah A., Thompson T. Implementing Decentralized Local Governance: A Treacherous Road with Potholes, Detours and Road Closures. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3353 28. Tiebout Ch.M. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy. 1956. Vol. 64. No. 5. Pp. 416–424.
Financing
Date