ERI FEB RAS
|Regionalistica 2023 Volume 10 number 3 pages 26-39|
|Title of the article||The Contribution of Intensive and Extensive Factors to Labor Productivity Dynamics in the Russian Far East|
|Author||Kim Andrey Leontyevich
junior research fellow, post-graduate student
Economic Research Institute FEB RAS
153, Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042
|Abstract||The growth rate of labor productivity is the most significant indicator of the standard of living and income of the population. In this regard, the question of the factors of economic growth is relevant. In this study, estimates of the contribution from economic efficiency (intensive factors) and the production factors’ growth rate (extensive factors) to the dynamics of the labor productivity for the regions of the Far Eastern Federal District in the period 2002–2020 were obtained. Due to the structural heterogeneity of the Far East, the analysis was carried out for two groups of regions: «North» (Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Magadan Region, Sakhalin Region, Chukotka Autonomous District) and «South» (Primorsky Territory, Khabarovsk Territory, Amur Region, Jewish Autonomous Region). It was found that the elasticity of substitution in the southern regions of the Far East is 0,4. In the northern regions, it is close to zero. The assessment of the contribution from factors to the labor productivity in the «South» group made on the basis of a method suggested by Dixon and Thirlwall for calculating the relative efficiency of regions of the national economy modified for the case of time series. Results have shown that the contribution of intensive factors (efficiency) to the growth of labor productivity increase over time, while the contribution of extensive factors (capital-labor ratio) decrease. Relative efficiency of the use of production factors in 2003–2020 grew in the south of the Far East at a rate of 3% per year. Labor productivity growth decomposition based on constant elasticity of substitution production function demonstrated an increase in the resource efficiency in excess of the labor productivity growth rate, which implies a significant contribution from intensive factors to the economic growth of the regions of the south of the Far Eastern Federal District.|
|Keywords||economic growth, labor productivity, economic efficiency, Far East|
|For citation||Kim A.L. The Contribution of Intensive and Extensive Factors to Labor Productivity Dynamics in the Russian Far East. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2023. Vol. 10. No. 3. Pp. 26–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2023.3.26 (In Russian)|
|References||1. Aganbegyan A.G. Development of the Far East: A National Program in the Context of National Projects. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2019. Vol. 15. No. 3. Pp. 165–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.3.165-181 (In Russian)
2. Bessonov V.A. On Dynamics of Total Factor Productivity in the Russian Economy in Transition. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VShE [HSE Economic Journal]. 2004. Vol. 8. No. 4. Pp. 542–587. (In Russian)
3. Voskoboynikov I.B. Total Factor Productivity Growth in Russia in 1961–2001 in Terms of the Fixed Assets Stock Correction Model. Moscow, 2003. 40 p. (In Russian)
4. Gaidar Ye.T. A Long Time. Russia in the World: Essays on Economic History. Moscow, 2022. 664 p. (In Russian)
5. Gritsko M.A. Human Potential of the «New» Russian Far East. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2020. Vol. 7. No. 1. Pp. 5–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2020.1.5 (In Russian)
6. Isaev A.G. The Territories of Accelerated Development: New Instrument of Regional Economic Policy. EKO [ECO Journal]. 2017. No. 4 (514). Pp. 61–77. (In Russian)
7. Minakir P.A. Studies of the Economy of the Far East. 1975–2000. Khabarovsk, 2017. 912 p. (In Russian)
8. Motrich E.L. The Population of the Far Eastern Federal District: Realities and Prospects. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2020. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 64–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2020.2.64 (In Russian)
9. Moon D.E. Evaluating Intensive Growth Factors in the Khabarovsk Territory. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2007. No. 1. Pp. 159–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2007.1.159-171 (In Russian)
10. The Synthesis of Scientific-Technological and Economic Forecasts: Pacific Russia – 2050. Ed. by P.A. Minakir, V.I. Sergienko. Vladivostok, 2011. 912 p. (In Russian)
11. Arrow K.J., Chenery H.B., Minhas B.S., Solow R.M. Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1961. Vol. 43. No. 3. Pp. 225–250.
12. Brown M., De Cani J.S. Technological Change and the Distribution of Income. International Economic Review. 1963. Vol. 4. No. 3. Pp. 289–309.
13. Cochrane D., Orcutt G.H. Application of Least Squares Regression to Relationships Containing Auto-Correlated Error Terms. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1949. Vol. 44. No. 245. Pp. 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1949.10483290
14. Dixon R.J., Thirlwall A.P. Regional Growth and Unemployment in the United Kingdom. London; Basingstoke: The Macmillian Press Ltd., 1975. 252 p.
15. Ferguson C.E. Time-Series Production Functions and Technological Progress in American Manufacturing Industry. Journal of Political Economy. 1965. Vol. 73. No. 2. Pp. 135–147.
16. Hildreth C., Lu J.Y. Demand Relations with Autocorrelated Disturbances (Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin. No. 276). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, 1960. 76 р.