Implementation of Preferential Policy in the Resource Economy of the Russian Far East: Opportunities for Moving from Growth to Development

ERI FEB RAS	Issue's contents	RUS
	Regionalistica 2022 Volume 9 number 6 pages 52-66

Title of the article	Implementation of Preferential Policy in the Resource Economy of the Russian Far East: Opportunities for Moving from Growth to Development
Pages	52-66
Author 1	Antonova Natalia Evgenyevna doctor of economics, assistant professor, chief researcher Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153, Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0003-0317-0817
Author 2	Lomakina Natalia Valentinovna doctor of economics, assistant professor, chief researcher Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153, Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0003-3490-5775
Abstract	The purpose of the study is to assess the possibilities and degree of advancement of the predominantly resource-based economy of the Far East towards the socio-ecological and economic sustainability of the macroregion. The article discusses the issues of formation and practical use of indicators for assessing development sustainability at the regional level. The dynamics of individual economic, social and environmental indicators of the development of the regions of the Far Eastern Federal District in 2013–2020 is studied against the background of the implementation of the tasks of the state policy of accelerated development of the macroregion. It is shown that the effect of preferential regimes was an increase in the resource dependence of the regional economy. On the example of the Far Eastern regions with a diversified and mono-resource economy, a certain decrease in sustainability parameters in terms of social indicators was revealed with a positive dynamics of economic and relative stability of environmental indicators. Estimates of implementation results in 2013–2020 state policy for the accelerated development of the Far East showed that investment activity and the positive direction of traditional indicators of economic growth are not a guarantee of sustainable socio-economic development of the region. The relevance and scientific significance of the development of methodological and methodological support for assessing socio-ecological and economic sustainability and the formation of its indicators as indicators of the transition from a growth trajectory to a development trajectory at the regional level is confirmed.
Code	332.14(571.6)
DOI	10.14530/reg.2022.6.52
Keywords	resource region ♦ preferential policy ♦ economic growth ♦ sustainable development ♦ economic and social indicators ♦ social and environmental well-being ♦ decoupling effect ♦ diversified economy ♦ mono-resource specialization ♦ Far Eastern Federal District
Download	2022-06.52.pdf
For citation	Antonova N.E., Lomakina N.V. Implementation of Preferential Policy in the Resource Economy of the Russian Far East: Opportunities for Moving from Growth to Development. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2022. Vol. 9. No. 6. Pp. 52–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2022.6.52 (In Russian)
References	1. Antonova N.E., Lomakina N.V. «Green» Economy Criteria and Indicators: Practices of Adaptation for the Amur Ecoregion. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 6. Pp. 5–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2019.6.5 (In Russian) 2. Baklanov P.Ya., Karakin V.P., Sheingauz A.S. Nature Management of the Far East and Adjacent Territories. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2005. No. 1. Pp. 27–45. (In Russian) 3. Blockov I.P. Environment and Its Protection in Russia. Changes in 25 Years. Moscow, 2018. 422 p. (In Russian) 4. Bobylev S.N., Kudryavtseva O.V., Solovyeva S.V., Sitkina K.S. Sustainable Development Indicators: Regional Dimension. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika [Moscow University Economics Bulletin]. 2018. No. 2. Pp. 21–33. (In Russian) 5. Galtseva N.V., Favstritskaya O.S., Sharypova O.A. Magadan Dream: Myths, Reality, Prospects. EKO [ECO Journal]. 2021. No. 9. Pp. 144–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2021-9-144-167 (In Russian) 6. Glazyrina I.P., Zabelina I.A. Prospects for «Green» Growth in the East of Russia and the New Silk Road. EKO [ECO Journal]. 2016. No. 7 (505). Pp. 5–20. (In Russian) 7. Zhukova E.V. Key Trends in ESG-Agenda Development: Reviewing the Situation in Russia and the World. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G.V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics]. 2021. Vol. 18. No. 6. Pp. 68–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2021-6-68-82 (In Russian) 8. Zabelina I.A. The Effect of Decoupling in the Ecological and Economic Development of Regions Participating in Cross-Border Interaction. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast]. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 1. Pp. 241–255. (In Russian) 9. Zabelina I.A., Klevakina E.A. Cross-Border Cooperation and Its Impact on the Quality of Economic Growth (On the Example of the Trans-Baikal Territory). EKO [ECO Journal]. 2013. No. 5. Pp. 108–123. (In Russian) 10. Kurbatova M.V., Levin S.N., Kagan E.S., Kislitsyn D.V. Resource-Type Regions in Russia: Definition and Classification. Теrrа Economicus [Terra Economicus]. 2019. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pp. 89–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-3-89-106 (In Russian) 11. Lomakina N.V. State Incentivizing of Investment Activity in the Resource Region: Far East of Russia Variant. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2020. Vol. 16. No. 4. Pp. 68–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2020.4.068-090 (In Russian) 12. Minakir P.A. Economic Development «Trapped» in Economic Growth: The Case of the Russian Far East. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2021. Vol. 17. No. 4. Pp. 7–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2021.4.007-015 (In Russian) 13. Mirzekhanova Z.G. Ecological Aspects of the Modern Development of the Far Eastern Regions in the Format of the «Green Economy» Model. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ = National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2021. Vol. 17. No. 4. Pp. 739–757. http://dx.doi.org/10.24891/ni.17.4.739 (In Russian) 14. Molchanov I.N., Molchanova N.P. Ecological Well-Being: Purpose and Means of Achievement. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes and Law. 2019. No. 12 (5). Pp. 32–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2019-12-5-32-43 (In Russian) 15. Turn to Nature: Russia’s New Environmental Policy in the Context of the «Green» Transformation of the World Economy and Politics: A Report on the Results of a Series of Situational Analyzes. Moscow, 2021. 98 p. (In Russian) 16. Ryumina E.V. Ecologically Adjusted Index of Human Development. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2020. Vol. 23. No. 1. Pp. 4–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/population.2020.23.1.1 (In Russian) 17. Syrtsova E.A., Pyzhev A.I., Zander E.V. True Savings of Siberian Regions: New Estimates, Old Problems. EKO [ECO Journal]. 2016. No. 6 (504). Pp. 109–129. (In Russian) 18. Shkiperova G.T., Druzhinin P.V., Kurilo A.E. Ecological and Economic Processes in the Regions of the European North of Russia: An Analysis of the Sustainability Window. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ = National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2020. Vol. 16. No. 4 (385). Pp. 644–661. (In Russian) 19. Naqvi A., Zwickl K. Fifty Shades of Green: Revisiting Decoupling by Economic Sector and Air Pollutants. Ecological Economics. 2017. Vol. 133. Pp. 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.017 20. Porfiryev B.N., Bobylev S.N. Cities and Megalopolises: The Problem of Definitions and Sustainable Development Indicators. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2018. Vol. 29. No. 2. Pp. 116–123.
Financing
Date