ECRIN
ERI FEB RAS
2023-5
Issue's contents
russian version
RUS
previous article Regionalistica 2023 Volume 10 number 5 pages 24-45 next article

 

Title of the article The Impact of Geopolitical Tensions on Economic Activity in Russia
Pages 24-45
Author 1 Vasilyeva Rogneda IvanovnaVasilyeva Rogneda Ivanovna
junior research fellow
Institute of Economics UB RAS
29, Moskovskaya Street, Yekaterinburg, Russia, 620014
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0001-5539-3145
Author 2 Rozhina Ekaterina AndreevnaRozhina Ekaterina Andreevna
junior research fellow
Institute of Economics UB RAS
29, Moskovskaya Street, Yekaterinburg, Russia, 620014
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0003-4543-6265
Author 3 Voytenkov Valentin AleksandrovichVoytenkov Valentin Aleksandrovich
research assistant
HSE University
20, Myasnitskaya Street, Moscow, Russia, 101000
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-7832-3710
Abstract The purpose of the research is to empirically assess the impact of geopolitical risks and economic policy uncertainty on economic activity in Russia. We implement business and consumer confidence index, shares of foreign trade with BRICS countries and western economies and economic growth rates to describe the domestic activity. We use monthly data ranged January 2010 till December 2021 for econometric modelling. The empirical strategy exploits vector error correction model to estimate the impact of external shocks on Russian economic activity. The results demonstrate that the enhancement of economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risks do not decrease the Russian producers’ confidence in the short run. However, the consumer expectations are found rather negative in the short and long term. The foreign trade of Russia with western countries significantly decreased over the investigated period, while trade turnover with BRICS countries enhanced. Meanwhile, the dynamics of trade with BRICS partners responds less to the changes in economic policy. Coincidently, geopolitical risks enhanced the trade flows between Russia and BRICS, which in turn promoted the Russian economic growth. The trade dynamics with European Union and United States shows a negative trend affected by external factors. However, it has minor effect on Russian economy in the long run. In this respect, we find evidence that economic activity in Russia is subject to external shocks. At the same time, the economy of Russian Federation can adopt to economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risks, therefore their negative influence in the short run smooth in the long-term perspective.
Code 339.9+519.862.6
DOI 10.14530/reg.2023.5.24
Keywords external shocks, economic growth, foreign trade, producer and consumer confidence, geopolitics
Download 2023-05.24.pdf
For citation Vasilyeva R.I., Rozhina E.A., Voytenkov V.A. The Impact of Geopolitical Tensions on Economic Activity in Russia. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2023. Vol. 10. No. 5. Pp. 24–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2023.5.24 (In Russian)
References 1. Zubarevich N.V. Regional Risks of a New Crisis for Employment and Regional Budgets. Monitoring ekonomicheskoy situatsii v Rossii: tendentsii i vyzovy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Monitoring of Russia’s Economic Outlook]. 2020. No. 7 (109). Pp. 3–13. (In Russian)
2. Akadiri S.S., Eluwole K.K., Akadiri A.C., Avci T. Does Causality Between Geopolitical Risk, Tourism and Economic Growth Matter? Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2020. Vol. 43. Pp. 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.09.002
3. Azzimonti M., Talbert M. Polarized Business Cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2014. Vol. 67. Pp. 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.07.001
4. Baker S.R., Bloom N., Davis S.J. Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2016. Vol. 131. No. 4. Pp. 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
5. Barrero J.M., Bloom N., Wright I. Short and Long Run Uncertainty. NBER Working Paper No. 23676. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w23676.pdf (accessed September 2023).
6. Bartik A.W., Bertrand M., Cullen Z., Glaeser E.L., Luca M., Stanton C. The Impact of COVID-19 on Small Business Outcomes and Expectations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020. Vol. 117. No. 30. Pp. 17656–17666. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006991117
7. Blomberg S.B., Hess G.D., Orphanides A. The Macroeconomic Consequences of Terrorism. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2014. Vol. 51. No. 5. Pp. 1007–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2004.04.001
8. Bloom N. The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks. Econometrica. 2009. Vol. 77. No. 3. Pp. 623–685. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6248
9. Boin A. The New World of Crises and Crisis Management: Implications for Policymaking and Research. Review of Policy Research. 2009. Vol. 26. No. 4. Pp. 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00389.x
10. Caldara D., Iacoviello M. Measuring Geopolitical Risk. American Economic Review. 2022. Vol. 112. No. 4. Pp. 1194–1225. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823
11. Cheng C.H.J., Chiu C.W.J. How Important Are Global Geopolitical Risks to Emerging Countries? International Economics. 2018. Vol. 156. Pp. 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2018.05.002
12. Colak G., Durnev A., Qian Y. Political Uncertainty and IPO Activity: Evidence from U.S. Gubernatorial Elections. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2017. Vol. 52. No. 6. Pp. 2523–2564. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017000862
13. Dakhlaoui I., Aloui C. The Interactive Relationship Between the US Economic Policy Uncertainty and BRIC Stock Markets. International Economics. 2016. Vol. 146. Pp. 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2015.12.002
14. Dickey D.A., Fuller W.A. Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1979. Vol. 74. No. 366a. Pp. 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
15. Fabeil N.F., Pazim K.H., Langgat J. The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic Crisis on Microenterprises: Entrepreneurs’ Perspective on Business Continuity and Recovery Strategy. Journal of Economics and Business. 2020. Vol. 3. No. 2. Pp. 837–844. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.03.02.241
16. Fairlie R. The Impact of COVID-19 on Small Business Owners: Evidence from the First Three Months After Widespread Social-Distancing Restrictions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 2020. Vol. 29. No. 4. Pp. 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12400
17. Glewwe P., Hall G. Are Some Groups More Vulnerable to Macroeconomic Shocks Than Others? Hypothesis Tests Based on Panel Data from Peru. Journal of Development Economics. 1998. Vol. 56. No. 1. Pp. 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00058-3
18. Global Economic Prospects, June 2020. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020. 234 p. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1553-9
19. Han H., Linton O., Oka T., Whang Y.-J. The Cross-Quantilogram: Measuring Quantile Dependence and Testing Directional Predictability Between Time Series. Journal of Econometrics. 2016. Vol. 193. No. 1. Pp. 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.03.001
20. Handley K., Limao N. Trade and Investment Under Policy Uncertainty: Theory and Firm Evidence. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 4. Pp. 189–222. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140068
21. Hassan S., Shabi S., Choudhry T. Asymmetry, Uncertainty and International Trade. Swansea University, School of Management, Working Paper № 2018-24. Available at: https://rahwebdav.swan.ac.uk/repec/pdf/WP2018-24.pdf (accessed September 2023).
22. Jens C.E. Political Uncertainty and Investment: Causal Evidence from U.S. Gubernatorial Elections. Journal of Financial Economics. 2017. Vol. 124. No. 3. Pp. 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.01.034
23. Karnizova L., Li J.C. Economic Policy Uncertainty, Financial Markets and Probability of US Recessions. Economics Letters. 2014. Vol. 125. No. 2. Pp. 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.09.018
24. Kolomak E.A. Economic Effects of Pandemic-related Restrictions in Russia and Their Spatial Heterogeneity. R-Economy. 2020. Vol. 6 No. 3. Pp. 154–161. https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2020.6.3.013
25. Muler N., Yohai V.J. Robust Estimation for Vector Autoregressive Models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 2013. Vol. 65. Pp. 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2012.02.011
26. Portuguez Castro M., Gomez Zermeno M.G. Being an Entrepreneur Post-COVID-19 – Resilience in Times of Crisis: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 4. Pp. 721–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2020-0246
27. Razumovskaia E., Yuzvovich L., Kniazeva E., Klimenko M., Shelyakin V. The Effectiveness of Russian Government Policy to Support SMEs in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2020. Vol. 6. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040160
28. Sims C.A. Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica. 1980. Vol. 48. No. 1. Pp. 1–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017
29. Sohag K., Vasilyeva R., Urazbaeva A., Voytenkov V. Stock Market Synchronization: The Role of Geopolitical Risk. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2022. Vol. 15. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15050204
30. Wang W. Impact of Western Sanctions on Russia in the Ukraine Crisis. Journal of Politics and Law. 2015. Vol. 8. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v8n2p1
Financing The research is carried out according to state task of the Institute of Economics UB RAS for 2021–2023 No. 0327-2021-0019 «Modelling of spatial development of territories within the concept of economic security».
Date  

Баннер

Лицензия Creative Commons
Если не указано другое, контент этого сайта доступен по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.