Regionalization of the Elements of National Input-Output Tables: Comparative Testing of Approaches (On the Example of the Khabarovsk Territory)

ERI FEB RAS	Issue's contents	RUS
	Regionalistica 2023 Volume 10 number 1 pages 21-33

Title of the article	Regionalization of the Elements of National Input-Output Tables: Comparative Testing of Approaches (On the Example of the Khabarovsk Territory)
Pages	21–33
Author 1	Belousova Anna Vasilyevna candidate of sciences (economics), senior research fellow Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153, Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-8780-8146
Author 2	Isaev Artem Gennadyevich candidate of sciences (economics), director Economic Research Institute FEB RAS 153, Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk, Russia, 680042 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0001-6569-2982
Abstract	Using the non-survey regionalization methods of national input-output tables (the method of location quotients of Flegg – Webber and the Kronenberg’s Cross-Hauling Adjusted Regionalization Method), a quantitative analysis of the multipliers of intersectoral interactions in the economy of the Khabarovsk Territory was carried out. In particular, estimates of total cost coefficients in the intersectoral balance model of the region, quantitatively identifying the impact of intersectoral relations in case of changes in demand for final products on gross outputs of types of economic activity in 2014, were obtained. It is revealed that all the values of the multipliers for the region are less than the corresponding values in the whole of the Russian Federation. At the same time, the estimates obtained using the Kronenberg’s method are close to the national ones, while the values of the multipliers calculated using the Flegg – Webber method (for non-specialized activities) are close to the unit value, which means that there are no multiplier effects. Structural differences between the national and regional economies necessitated the refinement of the estimates obtained for the subject of the Russian Federation. In connection with the latter circumstance, the authors performed a hybridization of the Kronenberg’s method, involving the use of actual statistical data on the total (interregional and international) import and export of the Khabarovsk Territory. Expert verification of the final estimates showed their relatively greater realism.
Code	332.14
DOI	10.14530/reg.2023.1.21
Keywords	intersectoral interactions, input-output table, technical coefficients, multiplier effect, Khabarovsk Territory
Download	2023-01.21.pdf
For citation	Belousova A.V., Isaev A.G. Regionalization of the Elements of National Input-Output Tables: Comparative Testing of Approaches (On the Example of the Khabarovsk Territory). Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2023. Vol. 10. No. 1. Pp. 21–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2023.1.21 (In Russian)
References	1. Analysis and Forecasting of the Development of the Economy of the Republic of Buryatia. Ed. by A.O. Baranov, Z.B.-D. Dondokov. Ulan-Ude, 2019. 204 p. (In Russian) 2. Belousova A.V. Modeling of Economic Effects of Changing of the Region’s External Environment Parameters. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2017. Vol. 4. No. 3. Pp. 14–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2017.3 (In Russian) 3. Belousova A.V. Assessment of Effects of Interindustry Interactions in the Economy of the Khabarovsk Territory with the Use Structural Balance Model. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2022. Vol. 9. No. 2. Pp. 5–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2022.2.5 (In Russian) 4. Vlasyuk L.I. Study of the Russian Far East’s Economy on the Basis of Input-Output Tables. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2006. No. 2. Pp. 79–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2006.2.079-090 (In Russian) 5. Vlasyuk L.I. Interindustry Model of the Far East’s Economy: The Experience of Predictive Modelling. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics. 2009. No. 2. Pp. 68–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2009.2.068-084 (In Russian) 6. Lukin E.V. About the Role of Input-Output Balance in Government Regulation of the Economy. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast]. 2017. Vol. 10. No. 3. Pp. 41–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.15838/esc.2017.3.51.2 (In Russian) 7. Maslov A.Yu. Symmetric Input-Output Tables System Construction. In: Scientific Articles – Institute of Economic Forecasting Russian Academy of Sciences. 2004. Vol. 2. Pp. 77–92. (In Russian) 8. Mikheeva N.N. Input-Output Tables: New Options of Economic Analysis. Voprosy ekonomiki = Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2011. No. 7. Pp. 140–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2011-7-140-148 (In Russian) 9. Flegg A.T., Webber C.D. On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables: Reply. Regional Studies. 1997. Vol. 31. No. 8. Pp. 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/713693401 10. Flegg A.T., Webber C.D., Elliott M.V. On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables. Regional Studies. 1995. Vol. 29. No. 6. Pp. 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409512331349173 11. Kronenberg T. Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods: The Role of Cross-Hauling. International Regional Science Review. 2009. Vol. 32. No. 1. Pp. 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017608322555 12. Round J.I. Nonsurvey Techniques: A Critical Review of the Theory and the Evidence. International Regional Science Review. 1983. Vol. 8. No. 3. Pp. 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001768300800302
Financing
Date