Measurement of Specially Protected Areas Contribution to Valuation of Adjusted Net Accumulations (Case Study of the Komi Republic)

ERI FEB RAS	Issue's contents	RUS
	Regionalistica 2020 Volume 7 number 5 pages 53-66

Title of the article	Measurement of Specially Protected Areas Contribution to Valuation of Adjusted Net Accumulations (Case Study of the Komi Republic)
Pages	53-66
Author 1	Tikonova Tatyana Vycheslavovna Candidate of science (economics), senior researcher Institute of Socio-Economic and Energy Problems of the North Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 26, Communism Street, Syktyvkar, Russia, 167982 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0002-2912-1696
Author 2	Seniawski Vitaly Anatolievich Candidate of science (economics), senior researcher Institute of Socio-Economic and Energy Problems of the North Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 26, Communism Street, Syktyvkar, Russia, 167982 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ORCID: 0000-0001-9051-5769
Abstract	The focus of the study is to assess resource efficiency by adjusting net savings through the effective use of resources in specially protected natural areas. On a regional example, calculations of ecosystem services and the added value of specially protected natural areas from the point of view of tourist destruction are justified and carried out, as well as an integrated approach to their assessment.
Code	502.131:502.4:338.48(470.13)
DOI	10.14530/reg.2020.5.53
Keywords	gross regional product ♦ gross value added ♦ monetary value assessment ♦ specially protected natural areas ♦ tourist destinations
Download	2020-05.53.pdf
For citation	Tikonova T.V., Seniawski V.A. Measurement of Specially Protected Areas Contribution to Valuation of Adjusted Net Accumulations (Case Study of the Komi Republic). Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2020. Vol. 7. No. 5. Pp. 53–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/reg.2020.5.53 (In Russian)
References	1. Antonova N.E., Lomakina N.V. Criteria and Indicators of the «Green» Economy: Adaptation Practice for the Amur Ecoregion. Regionalistica [Regionalistics]. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 6. Pp. 5–35. (In Russian) 2. Belik I.S., Spichin D.A. Social and Environmental Component of Sustainable Development of the Region. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of the Region]. 2013. No 3. Pp. 142–151. (In Russian) 3. Bobylev S.N., Minakov V.S., Solovieva S.V., Tretiakov V.V. Ecological-Economic Index of the Regions of the Russian Federation. World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and RIA Novosti, 2012. 152 p. (In Russian) 4. Boldyreva S.B. Impact of Tourism on the Social and Economic Development of the Region: Synthesis of Russian and Foreign Experience. Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional Economics: Theory and Practice]. 2018. Vol. 16. No. 5. Pp. 972–988. (In Russian) 5. Tourism Satellite Account: Recommended Methodological Framework. 2008 UN, UNWTO, OECD, Eurostat. Luxembourg, Madrid, New York, Paris, 2010. 145 p. Available at: http://www.cisstat.com/rus/SeriesF80rev1r.pdf (accessed 23 June 2018). (In Russian) 6. Dez I.A. Tourism and Other Sources of Income of Specially Protected Natural Areas: Opportunities and Prospects. Sovremennyie problemyi servisa i turizma [Modern Problems of Service and Tourism]. 2018. Vol. 12. No. 3. Pp. 43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1995-0411-2018-10304 (In Russian) 7. Druzhinin P.V., Skiperova G.T., Kurilo A.E. Development of the Green Belt of Finnoscandia on the Basis of the Activation of Tourism. Trudyi Karelskogo nauchnogo tsentra [Works of the Karelian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 154–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.17076/them1005 (In Russian) 8. Zomonova E.M. Strategy of Transition to «Green» Economy: Experience and Measurement Methods: Analytical Review. Novosibirsk: GPNTB SO RAS, 2015. 283 p. (In Russian) 9. Korobitsyn B.A. Methodical Approach to Accounting for Depletion of Natural Resources, Environmental Change and Human Capital in the Gross Regional Product. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of the Region]. 2015. No 3. Pp. 77–88. (In Russian) 10. Meller K., Rayala A. Rost Strategic Networks – New Models of Value Creation. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian Journal of Management]. 2008. Vol. 6. No. 4. Pp. 113–140. (In Russian) 11. Merkush G.E., Ushakov E.O. Assessment of the Value of Ecosystem Services for the Development of Recreation and Tourism. Vestnik SGUGiT [Journal of SGGiT]. 2016. Issue 1 (33). Pp. 200–209. (In Russian) 12. Methodological Provisions for Statistics Goskomstat of Russia. 1996. Vol. 1. Available at: https://gks.ru/bgd/free/B9910/Main.htm (accessed 24 April 2020). (In Russian) 13. Porter M. International Competition: Competitive Advantages of Countries. M.: Alpine Pablischer, 2016. 946 p. (In Russian) 14. Rubtsova N.V. Socio-Economic Efficiency of Tourism Activity: Theory, Methodology, Practice. Irkutsk: BGUEP Office, 2015. 212 p. (In Russian) 15. Rumina E.V. Environmental Aspects of Quality of Life. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of the Region]. 2016. Vol. 12. Issue 4. Pp. 1113–1122. (In Russian) 16. System of National Accounts 2008. UN, IMF, OECD, European Commission, World Bank. New York, 2012. 764 p. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008Russian.pdf (accessed 24 April 2020). 17. Snakin V.V., Yeskov E.V., Mitenko G.V., Ospennikov Y.U. Ecosystem Services of Protected Natural Areas. Zhizn zemli [Life of the Earth]. 2015. Vol. 37. Pp. 98–102. (In Russian) 18. Tatarinov A.A., Fomenko G.A., Fomenko M.A. Problems of Implementation of the System of Natural and Economic Accounting in Russia. Voprosyi statistiki [Statistics Issues]. 2018. Vol. 25. No. 3. Pp. 68–78. (In Russian) 19. Tikhonova T.V. Problems of Damage Assessment in Making Economic Decisions in the Northern Territories. Problemyi territorialnogo razvitiya [Problems of Territory Development]. 2020. No. 2 (106). Pp. 95–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2020.2.106.7 (In Russian) 20. Tikhonova T.V., Schenyavsky V.A. Correction of Indicators of Resource Efficiency on the Example of Specially Protected Natural Objects. Chasopis ekonomichnikh reforms [Chachopys of Economichy Reforms]. 2019. No. 2 (34). Pp. 86–94. 21. Skiperova G.T. Assessment of Ecological-Economic Effect of Specially Protected Natural Areas. Sotsialnoe prostranstvo [Social Space]. 2018. No. 3 (15). P. 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.15838/sa.2018.3.15.5 (In Russian) 22. Bukvareva E, Zamolodchikov D. Ecosystem Services of Terrestrial Ecosystems of Russia. Prototype of National Report. Moscow, 2015. 138 p. 23. Erfassung und Bewertung von Okosystemdienstleistungen (OSD) / K. Grunewald [et al.]. Bundesamt fur Naturschutz, 2014. 374 р. 24. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. UNEP, Island Press, Washington DC, 2005. 283 p. 25. Resource Efficiency: Potential and Economic Implications. A Report by the International Resource Panel. March 2017. 167 p. Available at: http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/KnowledgeResources/AssessmentAreasReports/Cross-CuttingPublications/tabid/133337/Default.aspx (accessed 14 September 2017). 26. Spenceley A., Meyer D. Tourism and Poverty Reduction: Theory and Practice in Less Economically Developed Countries. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2012. Vol. 20. Pp. 297–317. 27. Tourism and Visitor Management in Protected Areas. Guidelines for Sustainability. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland, 2018. 136 p. Available at: http://www.iucn.org.pa_guidelines (accessed 22 April 2020). 28. Font X., Garay L., Jone S. Sustainability Motivations and Practices in Small Tourism Enterprises in European Protected Areas. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. Vol. 137. Pp. 1439–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.01.071
Financing
Date